←back to thread

688 points hunglee2 | 2 comments | | HN request time: 0.622s | source
Show context
boplicity ◴[] No.34718200[source]
I think I would be very skeptical that this was actually written by Seymour Hersh. This Substack was created today. There's no previous history on it. I can't find any credible evidence that this is actually Seymour Hersh.

If it's not Seymour, it sure is very effective propoganda.

Does anyone see any proof that this is indeed written by the claimed author?

replies(4): >>34718440 #>>34718528 #>>34719262 #>>34720318 #
marianatom ◴[] No.34718440[source]
The substack was created today, then Russian outlet Sputnik ran the story hours later. Then a hacker news account with pro CCP content submitted this substack.

Why is this rubbish on top of hacker news?

replies(2): >>34718548 #>>34720418 #
htrgh[dead post] ◴[] No.34718548[source]
[flagged]
1. judahmeek ◴[] No.34718802[source]
If there's a lot of facts that discredit a narrative, then people simply stating those facts are not a part of a "concentrated effort".

Your contrarian logic is going to take you down a very sorrowful & dimly lit path in life.

replies(2): >>34718924 #>>34720312 #
2. dang ◴[] No.34720312[source]
Please don't cross into personal attack, regardless of how wrong someone is or you feel they are.

https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html