←back to thread

1345 points philosopher1234 | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.319s | source
Show context
dopeboy ◴[] No.34628557[source]
CS before it went downhill. Played so much de_dust (before de_dust2 became popular) from the beta days to 1.6.
replies(4): >>34628645 #>>34628968 #>>34629174 #>>34629223 #
danjoredd ◴[] No.34628645[source]
When did it go downhill? I thought CS: Source was great fun. Didn't really care for CS:Go
replies(4): >>34628932 #>>34628965 #>>34631005 #>>34631606 #
ceedan ◴[] No.34631005[source]
Source was a complete mess. It took years of updates before that game was playable competitively -- it never truly was. The half-life 2 engine was a disaster, and most players didn't have the hardware to run those games well at the time. That's what made 1.6 so wonderful - you could run it on single core Pentium 4 processor and literally anything better. For 10 years, it had the best gameplay and a huge playerbase, with entry level system requirements. Many people I knew didn't move to CSS, because getting a $1000 PC was out of the cards - most of us were kids.

In 2007, DirectTV killed the North American professional CS scene by pushing CS:Source into their televised CGS league. The top pro players all left the 1.6 scene for 30-40k/yr contracts to play in CGS (a no brainer)... most of them openly hated the game while playing in this league too. The 1.6 scene in the US was still large and active, but never the same. Teams in Europe, Asia, Brazil & elsewhere continued to play 1.6. After CGS folded in 2008, global competition sort died off and many of he top NA players retired. There weren't many NA 1.6 players good enough to keep up with European pro teams after about 2010.

Imo, CS was an incredible scene from like 2000-2008. CSGO has enjoyed a great run from like 2013-2018?. It's definitely lost steam from the battle royal shooters (PUBG & Fortnite), and now Valorant infringing on it's player base. Valve hasn't really been very active in its own competitive scene, which may also be hurting.

replies(2): >>34631529 #>>34634599 #
1. least ◴[] No.34634599[source]
> That's what made 1.6 so wonderful - you could run it on single core Pentium 4 processor and literally anything better.

I played CS 1.6 on a Pentium 1 133mhz processor and no discrete gpu and it worked fine, though I did eventually get an athlon xp 1700+ and geforce 3 ti 500.

The game ran on practically everything.