←back to thread

1345 points philosopher1234 | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.239s | source
Show context
dopeboy ◴[] No.34628557[source]
CS before it went downhill. Played so much de_dust (before de_dust2 became popular) from the beta days to 1.6.
replies(4): >>34628645 #>>34628968 #>>34629174 #>>34629223 #
danjoredd ◴[] No.34628645[source]
When did it go downhill? I thought CS: Source was great fun. Didn't really care for CS:Go
replies(4): >>34628932 #>>34628965 #>>34631005 #>>34631606 #
jeffwask ◴[] No.34628965[source]
Source wasn't well received by a portion of the community. The community bisected for a while with some folks staying on 1.6. I don't recall everything behind the 20+ year old drama but it was a thing. Source eventually won out and the rest is history.
replies(3): >>34629342 #>>34633168 #>>34641651 #
1. r9550684 ◴[] No.34629342[source]
source engine is different from goldsrc, and the "feel" of goldsrc goes back to q2 (and some idiosyncrasies from q1). so if you spent several years playing from beta days, or for some people transitioned into cs from even more years of q2 or q1, then source would just be an entirely new experience. there's nothing valve could've done to preserve the right feeling, which is fine. old timers continued playing goldsrc until full blown grown up took over, where's new timers were formed by the conventions of source and further.