←back to thread

333 points indigodaddy | 5 comments | | HN request time: 0.001s | source
Show context
franciscop ◴[] No.33580409[source]
> "My media content had been pushed aside into a submenu while the app promotes its own streaming media and premium services instead."

This is my biggest pet-peeve coming from Linux world. In Linux the music players you find bundled with different distros are simple, but they just work.

However since moving to MacOS, I have to either use iTunes or Music, and in Android the default music player and the latest updates of the alt music player I installed the author problem is true; they expect me to use their services and that's front and clear, while my local music is hidden away in a menu button.

This is a fairly ridiculous situation IMHO (well, solitaire in Windows getting ads/online is slightly more, but I'll never go there) since a music player that fulfills my needs is pretty easy: show a list of artists, play either the whole artist or a single album in shuffle mode.

Attempt 1: https://twitter.com/FPresencia/status/1364892370509127681

Attempt 2: https://twitter.com/FPresencia/status/1578720636645826560

replies(6): >>33580551 #>>33580648 #>>33580810 #>>33582153 #>>33582494 #>>33582721 #
abawany ◴[] No.33580810[source]
I recommend VLC - works well on windows, ios, macos, and android and frankly improves over the native players in each without unnecessary frills.
replies(3): >>33581132 #>>33583968 #>>33588480 #
DoingIsLearning ◴[] No.33581132[source]
I think GP's issue is not lack of technical solutions but that most OSs and BigTech are increasingly user hostile to extract more revenue.

I alsobfind it concerning that they are succeding. We now have whole chunks of the world's demographic that don't even know it doesn't have to be that way.

replies(1): >>33582032 #
1. KyeRussell ◴[] No.33582032[source]
Expecting that the typical user wants to use a streaming service, and deprioritising development of tools/components that target other workflows, is not user-hostile. It is clearly the way things are, and the nerds are being dragged kicking and screaming.
replies(2): >>33582168 #>>33583412 #
2. aikinai ◴[] No.33582168[source]
Amen. I'm 100% in the old-school, self-managed local media camp, but I'm well aware that I'm an extreme minority and can't expect mass-market companies to cater to my use case.

I'm probably one of the last 1,000 people still using Apple Home Sharing, but honestly I can't even believe it's still working. There must be someone on the inside that uses it at home and keeps fixing it whenever the architecture shifts around it.

replies(2): >>33585554 #>>33588728 #
3. DoingIsLearning ◴[] No.33583412[source]
I completely disagree:

- Removing the concept of files, folders, and folder paths

- Removing the concept of URLs and URL resolution

- Saving files directly to a cloud based storage without local offline representation

This is not deprioritising, this actively removing features and being hostile.

More worrying is how exceedingly fragile all of this is. One company bankrupcy, one government embargo, one anti-government protest in an opressive regime and all of your online self is gone.

4. onlycoffee ◴[] No.33585554[source]
> I'm 100% in the old-school, self-managed local media camp, but I'm well aware that I'm an extreme minority and can't expect mass-market companies to cater to my use case.

We are now the Eloi and mass-market companies are the Morlocks.

5. brokenmachine ◴[] No.33588728[source]
Stay strong brother. I still use and prefer local-everything.

There's dozens of us! Dozens!