←back to thread

DeviantArt upsets artists with its new AI art generator, DreamUp

(arstechnica.com)
125 points akeck | 1 comments | 13 Nov 22 02:33 UTC | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
charcircuit ◴[13 Nov 22 04:12 UTC] No.33579956[source]▶
Looking at the comment section it seems that people struggle to understand how it works and thinks it is literally copying parts of people's images.

Educating people about such a technical topic seems very difficult especially since people get emotional of their work being used.

replies(6): >>33580043 #>>33580089 #>>33580091 #>>33580110 #>>33580133 #>>33581243 #
odessacubbage ◴[13 Nov 22 04:39 UTC] No.33580133[source]▶
this is such a weird sentiment to see in tech communities like hn that are generally so focused on data privacy.
replies(3): >>33580200 #>>33580211 #>>33581178 #
1. bakugo ◴[13 Nov 22 04:51 UTC] No.33580200[source]▶
I agree. At this point I just assume that anyone defending any kind of AI generation has never created anything of their own and is probably stands to earn money from this in some way, because I can't think of a single reason why anyone who actually creates the data that is being used for AI training without permission would be okay with it.