←back to thread

2827 points xd | 3 comments | | HN request time: 0.604s | source
Show context
saberience ◴[] No.32769157[source]
It's weird, I've never considered myself a "royalist" but this news has affected me quite strongly. I just burst into tears unexpectedly on hearing this news and I don't quite understand why I feel so very sad. I guess I have grown up and lived my whole life (as a Brit) seeing and hearing the Queen, singing "God save the Queen" etc, and this news made me suddenly feel very old, very nostalgic, with the sense that all things pass in time, which makes my heart ache deeply.
replies(53): >>32769288 #>>32769344 #>>32769392 #>>32769424 #>>32769632 #>>32769695 #>>32769757 #>>32769765 #>>32769782 #>>32769842 #>>32769907 #>>32769929 #>>32769937 #>>32769977 #>>32770020 #>>32770034 #>>32770079 #>>32770147 #>>32770183 #>>32770184 #>>32770249 #>>32770466 #>>32770670 #>>32770772 #>>32770887 #>>32770970 #>>32771210 #>>32771531 #>>32771721 #>>32771782 #>>32772054 #>>32772527 #>>32772762 #>>32772809 #>>32772870 #>>32773117 #>>32773349 #>>32773536 #>>32773875 #>>32773895 #>>32774201 #>>32774387 #>>32774546 #>>32775599 #>>32776134 #>>32776363 #>>32776880 #>>32777708 #>>32778852 #>>32780752 #>>32780854 #>>32788005 #>>32799830 #
Nursie ◴[] No.32769424[source]
Apparently, when I was little, I got excited one Christmas when the Queen’s speech was on tv, because I thought it was my Grandmother…

I used to take comfort in the idea that all things pass in time, now not so much. Probably because I realised that includes everyone I love, and myself!

I’ve no great love for the monarchy, but this is certainly the end of an era in British public life and likely in UK international relations - I can’t see the commonwealth nations welcoming King Charles as their new head of state.

And it is weird, there are some things you just never expect to change. I’m hardly a spring chicken, but Queen Elizabeth was not only there my entire life, but Queen far enough into the past before I was born to have interacted with historical figures (like Churchill).

replies(3): >>32769768 #>>32770325 #>>32776161 #
spaceman_2020 ◴[] No.32770325[source]
What is the sentiment like in the UK about Charles vs William? Heard lots of people calling for him to just hand it over to William straight away.
replies(7): >>32770441 #>>32770484 #>>32770546 #>>32770578 #>>32770748 #>>32773496 #>>32777405 #
youngtaff ◴[] No.32770484[source]
My hope is Charles does enough damage that we will finally get rid of the Monarchy
replies(1): >>32771599 #
bigfudge ◴[] No.32771599[source]
Before anyone dismissed this as a cheap shot or ungenerous, we need to remember that this is likely our only route to a republic given the absurd biases in uk media and establishment.
replies(2): >>32771826 #>>32771943 #
1. kwhitefoot ◴[] No.32771826[source]
In what meaningful and useful sense will a republic be different from what the UK is now?
replies(1): >>32772131 #
2. billyruffian ◴[] No.32772131[source]
Well, it would be a lot harder to sack president Boris /s.

I defer to the historian Niall Ferguson who said (I paraphrase) that purpose of monarchy is to protect the people from its government. From a UK perspective, it seems to work.

replies(1): >>32776075 #
3. bigfudge ◴[] No.32776075[source]
It works in many subtle ways.

But let’s take one example: the monarchy and the ludicrous rules and conventions that go with it to govern parliament are just one way working class MPs are intimidated and given the information that they are not really welcome in the corridors of power.

Let’s remember also that the British people have not sacked Boris. Conservative mps worried for their personal survival sacked him and 300,000 old white people from the south east of England have, for the third time in recent years, made Truss our PM. She has no regard for the manifesto that her party was elected on. Everything is by convention in the UK, which means people with privilege can do whatever they like.