←back to thread

Queen Elizabeth II has died

(www.bbc.com)
2827 points xd | 2 comments | 08 Sep 22 17:33 UTC | HN request time: 0.001s | source
Show context
saberience ◴[08 Sep 22 17:52 UTC] No.32769157[source]▶
It's weird, I've never considered myself a "royalist" but this news has affected me quite strongly. I just burst into tears unexpectedly on hearing this news and I don't quite understand why I feel so very sad. I guess I have grown up and lived my whole life (as a Brit) seeing and hearing the Queen, singing "God save the Queen" etc, and this news made me suddenly feel very old, very nostalgic, with the sense that all things pass in time, which makes my heart ache deeply.
replies(53): >>32769288 #>>32769344 #>>32769392 #>>32769424 #>>32769632 #>>32769695 #>>32769757 #>>32769765 #>>32769782 #>>32769842 #>>32769907 #>>32769929 #>>32769937 #>>32769977 #>>32770020 #>>32770034 #>>32770079 #>>32770147 #>>32770183 #>>32770184 #>>32770249 #>>32770466 #>>32770670 #>>32770772 #>>32770887 #>>32770970 #>>32771210 #>>32771531 #>>32771721 #>>32771782 #>>32772054 #>>32772527 #>>32772762 #>>32772809 #>>32772870 #>>32773117 #>>32773349 #>>32773536 #>>32773875 #>>32773895 #>>32774201 #>>32774387 #>>32774546 #>>32775599 #>>32776134 #>>32776363 #>>32776880 #>>32777708 #>>32778852 #>>32780752 #>>32780854 #>>32788005 #>>32799830 #
orobinson ◴[08 Sep 22 18:22 UTC] No.32769695[source]▶
I feel the same. I think it’s because it really represents the end of an era. The 20th and early 21st century ushered in unprecedented improvements to quality of life in Britain but it has felt of late that that has peaked and the country is facing a serious decline: Brexit, the increasingly visible effects of climate change, the aftermath of covid, the possible break up of the union, rising costs of living, recession, possibly even war. The death of Elizabeth II coincides with the end of a long period of stability and comfort and is not only a poignant point in history itself but a marker for a transitional point in history for our country.
replies(11): >>32769895 #>>32769976 #>>32770056 #>>32771142 #>>32771498 #>>32771689 #>>32772994 #>>32773063 #>>32773236 #>>32774576 #>>32777033 #
ralusek[dead post] ◴[08 Sep 22 18:31 UTC] No.32769895[source]▶
dang ◴[08 Sep 22 18:49 UTC] No.32770206[source]▶
We've banned this account for repeatedly posting flamebait and unsubstantive comments. That's not allowed here.

If you don't want to be banned, you're welcome to email hn@ycombinator.com and give us reason to believe that you'll follow the rules in the future. They're here: https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html.

(Since someone is now about to accuse me of stealth Brexit sideage—no, this is just about the tiny business of moderating an internet forum, and that is all.)

I don't lightly ban a 7-year-old account, but (a) we've warned you many times:

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=22976700 (April 2020)

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=20912638 (Sept 2019)

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=20477028 (July 2019)

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=19765448 (April 2019)

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=17865589 (Aug 2018)

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=17623237 (July 2018)

... and (b) you've broken the site guidelines repeatedly lately.

replies(3): >>32770630 #>>32770882 #>>32771446 #
ralusek ◴[08 Sep 22 20:14 UTC] No.32771446[source]▶
I contribute to this forum in good faith, I strongly disagree with this ban.
replies(2): >>32771568 #>>32773200 #
1. dang ◴[08 Sep 22 20:22 UTC] No.32771568[source]▶
Edit: I've taken another look at this and decided that this was partly an overreaction on my part—sorry for that.

I've unbanned you now. If you'd please review https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html and mitigate the ways that you've been breaking the rules, that would be helpful so we don't end up in this boat again.

---

That may be, but you still have to follow the rules. You broke them here, have broken them elsewhere, we've warned you many times, and I've just told you how to get unbanned if you want to.

replies(1): >>32780684 #
2. ralusek ◴[09 Sep 22 15:48 UTC] No.32780684[source]▶
Thank you very much. I will do a full review of my warnings and the rules. I'm a huge fan of this forum, and would hate to lose access to one of the only outlets left where people seem to be willing to think out loud. I think the level of moderation here (you) generally does a good job of striking the proper balance between free thought and destructive chaos, and I can appreciate the difficulty of handling any borderline cases.