> > They weren't. Please don't put words in others' mouths.
> They were.
Nope. "If you study geopolitics and history, you might come to the conclusion that Russia was never going to be a democratic ally of the West regardless of how much economic aid they were given" is only a prediction of one likely result of an action.
It's only a commentary on one's person if one is the kind of person who thinks everything is about them.
> To make it even more obvious: "I think someone needs to read a little more history" https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=32665292
A later comment in reply to your accusation. And you're surprised you got it reflected back at you? Ah, maybe you didn't realise how well-deserved that was.
> > And quit whining about the guidelines
> No. And your comment is blatantly violating the guidelines.
Oh, not only violating, but blatantly violating, eh? Sez you.
> > you're violating them at least as much as anyone else
> Nothing nearly as bad as your comment.
You would think so.
I don't.
> Also, even if you believe that someone else is violating the guidelines, that doesn't justify your own violations, unless you have complete disregard for them.
Exactly. Ponder on that for a while.