Of course Yeltsin was a big part of the problem too.
Of course Yeltsin was a big part of the problem too.
Russia at the end of the cold war had geopolitical imperatives such as a warm water ports, buffer states and desire for Russian hegemony that would have existed regardless of their economic state. They also have a long, long history of authoritarianism.
Please don't make assumptions about what other people have or haven't studied.
> They also have a long, long history of authoritarianism.
You could say the same about the Axis powers in WW2.
"Can you believe Russia would invade to get a warm water port?!"
Yes, I would.
Btw your analogy of "why isn't germany authoritarian" is off the mark, because the Russians and NATO completely dismantled the existing power structures post ww2 through force. We did not do anything close to that post cold war. In fact the communist party still exists today in Russia.
Another point is that the US made it clear it would not tolerate an openly authoritarian government in Western Europe but would tolerate far right groups for its own purposes against communism.
> "Can you believe Russia would invade to get a warm water port?!"
> Yes, I would.
You couldn't have a more blatant straw man argument.
I'm not going to reply to you anymore. All you're doing here is chest beating.