←back to thread

1444 points feross | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.287s | source
Show context
TazeTSchnitzel ◴[] No.32641381[source]
It's really interesting that such a bland, un-subversive show whose only mentions of sensitive topics are in bad throwaway jokes is so heavily censored. I guess a more interesting show would just not get aired at all.
replies(11): >>32641593 #>>32641959 #>>32641967 #>>32642113 #>>32642265 #>>32642275 #>>32642430 #>>32642432 #>>32642533 #>>32642820 #>>32643185 #
commandlinefan ◴[] No.32642265[source]
> such a bland, un-subversive show ... is so heavily censored

American censorship is honestly no better, it's just that the show was written with the specifics of American censorship in mind.

replies(1): >>32642424 #
function_seven ◴[] No.32642424[source]
Bullshit.

Sorry, this "we're the same" retort is exhausting. The United States government does not employ censors to remove portions of shows before allowing them to air (or stream, whatever). The closest thing I can think of is DoD not giving access to a movie unless it paints Navy pilots in a certain light. Okay, fine. Not nearly the same as what this site is showing us.

Yes, we have cultural taboos, like any culture. Studios have more trouble presenting some viewpoints over others. Chappelle gets protested, that one episode of Community was memory-holed on Hulu (but not on Amazon!). We ban pornography on public airwaves (but not on streaming or cable or satellite, or Blueray).

If you compare and contrast the pervasiveness of censorship between China and the United States, the difference is huge.

When it comes to artistic freedom, the US is way better than China. Maybe you can say we can improve even more, sure. But that's a long way off from our censorship being "honestly no better".

replies(4): >>32642551 #>>32642611 #>>32642906 #>>32651164 #
commandlinefan ◴[] No.32642611[source]
> The United States government does not employ censors to remove portions of shows

What? Yes it does - the FCC has been doing this for a half-century at least.

replies(2): >>32642693 #>>32642849 #
function_seven ◴[] No.32642693[source]
I noted that in my comment:

> We ban pornography on public airwaves (but not on streaming or cable or satellite, or Blueray).

And the FCC has a very narrow scope. I also happen to disagree with their prudishness (Janet Jackson, 2003). It does not back the argument that we're "honestly no better".

replies(1): >>32663029 #
1. fortuna86 ◴[] No.32663029[source]
FCC always only covers broadcast TV and radio, not cable or streaming.