Of course Yeltsin was a big part of the problem too.
Of course Yeltsin was a big part of the problem too.
I’m skeptical of the idea that you can impose Democracy.
Federalist No_14 also had a lot to say on the matter: “In a democracy, the people meet and exercise the government in person; in a republic, they assemble and administer it by their representatives and agents. A democracy, consequently, will be confined to a small spot. A republic may be extended over a large region.”
[1] https://ar.usembassy.gov/education-culture/irc/u-s-governmen...
There's a certain segment who seem very adamant that this is a very important argument to win against "the left". But I've never met any "leftist" who cares particularly - most seem to shrug, concede the label and move on.
I'm pretty much in agreement. The US is a democracy in the wide sense in that it uses a democratic process to choose government. It's also true that it's a representative democracy in that the process works by people choosing representatives. So sure - constitutional federal republic.
But why does anyone think this is particularly important, and why is this seen as something that there is any left/right distinction on is beyond me.