←back to thread

1444 points feross | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.285s | source
Show context
ALittleLight ◴[] No.32641619[source]
I can see how this might backfire. You notice a censored jump and start to feel the itch of curiosity as to what it concealed. I had to watch several of the censored scenes whereas I would have never just randomly watched clips of the show.

Also, love the presentation on this page.

replies(8): >>32642328 #>>32642481 #>>32642563 #>>32643000 #>>32643351 #>>32643643 #>>32644533 #>>32648241 #
andruby ◴[] No.32642481[source]
We (the HN crowd, often living in less-censored societies) would be very curious.

I’d like to know how curious this would make non-HN people, and those living in more censored places.

My assumption is that they take it for granted and just continue to watch the show. It might be hard for them to even find the uncensored clips.

replies(5): >>32643389 #>>32645007 #>>32646115 #>>32646867 #>>32647033 #
lettergram[dead post] ◴[] No.32645007[source]
brigandish ◴[] No.32645224[source]
I think the downvotes you're attracting give some indication for the HN crowd.
replies(4): >>32645308 #>>32645346 #>>32646106 #>>32646123 #
lettergram[dead post] ◴[] No.32645346[source]
elefanten ◴[] No.32645549[source]
Well taking only this thread as a datapoint... your list of censored news stories wasn't convincing. In what sense were any of those "censored"? I read all those cases being made on the internet. Are you naming editorial choice of what to publish "censorship"? I'm just confused.

Anecdotally from my own perspective, I see big waves of voting on HN that go in various political directions. Seems consistent with self-selection by topic combined with randomness.

None of it inspires confidence in your assessment of being "censored" on HN, or diagnosing the audience as less curious.

replies(1): >>32645954 #
lettergram ◴[] No.32645954[source]
1. Are you serious? Why is Alex Jones censored? Why is Trump censored? Why did people get indefinitely banned for discussing many of those topics on social media?

Just a few days ago Zuckerberg was discussing banning / suppressing discussion of the Hunter Biden laptop - https://nypost.com/2022/08/25/mark-zuckerberg-criticizes-twi...

Idk what to say about that. It’s not editorial decisions when DMs are being censored or social media posts. Particularly when the FBI / government is suggesting it.

2. This is a perfect example of my point. Most people don’t even realize they are surrounded by censorship. Or they outright agree with it. Look up the list of topics bannable on YouTube. On Twitter you can’t even call someone by the name their parents gave them if they disagree. In schools near where I live you can get suspended for using proper pronouns, if someone disagrees.

Censorship in the US is different, but very apparent.

replies(3): >>32646173 #>>32646203 #>>32646352 #
koprulusector ◴[] No.32646203[source]
Seriously, what are you talking about? Last I checked Alex Jones has his own show and Trump has his own social network which has been (might still be) #1 in Apple’s App Store. I am confused on how this is censorship?

That said, if a private company like Twitter thinks Alex Jones is a liability because he spreads conspiracy theories of shape shifting lizard people from alternate dimensions sabotaging the Trump Presidency via the deep state because he’s prepping the military and cia to take out the satanic cultists that worship and appease said lizard shapeshifting creatures via the blood of post-coital children, well…

replies(1): >>32647678 #
inkblotuniverse ◴[] No.32647678[source]
There's an argument that huge social media sites that have wide-scale usage are like utilities. The water company isn't allowed to shut off your taps because you said something they don't like.
replies(1): >>32648100 #
1. Dylan16807 ◴[] No.32648100[source]
That's a very valid argument, but it's a bit of a tangent from censorship.

Let me make an analogy to Alex Jones and Trump: if the water company cuts someone off, but they continue to run a huge fountain in front of their mansion, then you can't reasonably claim they're being deprived of drinking water.