←back to thread

1444 points feross | 2 comments | | HN request time: 0.521s | source
Show context
ALittleLight ◴[] No.32641619[source]
I can see how this might backfire. You notice a censored jump and start to feel the itch of curiosity as to what it concealed. I had to watch several of the censored scenes whereas I would have never just randomly watched clips of the show.

Also, love the presentation on this page.

replies(8): >>32642328 #>>32642481 #>>32642563 #>>32643000 #>>32643351 #>>32643643 #>>32644533 #>>32648241 #
andruby ◴[] No.32642481[source]
We (the HN crowd, often living in less-censored societies) would be very curious.

I’d like to know how curious this would make non-HN people, and those living in more censored places.

My assumption is that they take it for granted and just continue to watch the show. It might be hard for them to even find the uncensored clips.

replies(5): >>32643389 #>>32645007 #>>32646115 #>>32646867 #>>32647033 #
lettergram[dead post] ◴[] No.32645007[source]
brigandish ◴[] No.32645224[source]
I think the downvotes you're attracting give some indication for the HN crowd.
replies(4): >>32645308 #>>32645346 #>>32646106 #>>32646123 #
snowwrestler ◴[] No.32646123[source]
Not a single one of those stories was suppressed by the government in the U.S., which is what the article details happening in China. In fact many government officials supported and promoted those stories.

Disagreement among private parties, or getting less private promotion than you wanted to get, is not “censorship”. It’s free speech in action.

replies(3): >>32646279 #>>32646312 #>>32649177 #
ALittleLight ◴[] No.32646279[source]
The Hunter Biden laptop story wasn't suppressed by the US government? Zuckerberg was on Rogan recently explaining that the FBI told him the story was Russian disinformation and Facebook took that to mean they should suppress the story and they did. Presumably something similar happened to Twitter and possibly other platforms. If memory serves former intelligence officials do go to mainstream media and say the story was fake. In what sense is this not government suppression?
replies(2): >>32646538 #>>32646541 #
1. snowwrestler ◴[] No.32646541[source]
In the sense that the government did not suppress it. The NY Post ran the story with zero legal consequences and people in the U.S. have published and spoken continuously about it from then until now.
replies(1): >>32649191 #
2. brigandish ◴[] No.32649191[source]
Should we applaud the government for finding lackeys to help them avoid the letter of the law but not the spirit?