←back to thread

114 points valgaze | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.205s | source
Show context
vanadium1st ◴[] No.32462715[source]
I am a working digital artist, my personal feed is filled with takes like this. I understand the crisis that artists go through currently and I understand their emotions. I've personally made peace with it already, but it will take time for everyone and there will be a lot of concern, rage and bargaining in the process.

All of us artists woke up in the world where the thing we were learning to produce all of our lives became 100x cheaper. I've been kinda waiting for this to happen for truck drivers or translators and was honestly surprised that it got to the artists first. But, there's nothing to do now.

There will be a lot of takes trying different ways to deny this reality. Like if we agree that this thing is immoral or anti-cultural it will go away and our potential customers will forget about it. I think that it's a waste of time The industry is not completely gone, but it will go though a massive transformation. The basic hierarchy of artists will probably stay the same - people who were good in the pre-ai era will still be good working with the ai. If you've learned your basic skills right - they will still work.

I've personally already changed my workflow to use ai art for the sketches, ideas and references. And then polish them to commercial level using my old experience and skills. It's funny how this thing is so new, but I've gotten so used to it that it's already hard for me to come back to my old set of tools. And I do recommend all other artists to do the same and to try to find their place in the new reality - it really seems like there's no other way.

replies(1): >>32463930 #
p1esk ◴[] No.32463930[source]
Do you think the AI will become better than the best human artist? In the foreseeable future?
replies(4): >>32464383 #>>32464466 #>>32466340 #>>32473977 #
antisthenes ◴[] No.32466340[source]
I think the bigger point is that while it might not be better, it could be "good enough" and 1000x faster/cheaper at the same time.

Instead of hiring 100 artists, you could have this 1 model generating images, and then 10 artists touching up AI's results to take them from 90% to 99% on quality.

It facilitates more capital consolidation.

replies(1): >>32466590 #
1. p1esk ◴[] No.32466590[source]
I personally couldn’t care less about 99% quality. I want to see genius level work - of the same impact as Monet, Matisse, Picasso, Dali - something unlike anything else in the dataset.