←back to thread

1135 points carride | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
qwe----3 ◴[] No.32411651[source]
> over $30,000 for each of those homes to get served

This doesn't seem very efficient to me.

replies(13): >>32411670 #>>32411682 #>>32411693 #>>32411775 #>>32411831 #>>32411955 #>>32412075 #>>32412123 #>>32412258 #>>32413016 #>>32413760 #>>32414638 #>>32420670 #
fourthark ◴[] No.32411831[source]
At $55/mo, he'll start making a profit in 45 years.
replies(1): >>32411957 #
TrueGeek ◴[] No.32411957[source]
From the article: he had $2.6MM in help from the "American Rescue Plan's Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds".

He's being paid by the government to bring Internet access to homes in the state that aren't currently wired for it.

replies(2): >>32412037 #>>32412153 #
qwe----3 ◴[] No.32412037[source]
That bill and these types of projects are basically why we have 10% inflation now.
replies(5): >>32412105 #>>32412142 #>>32412152 #>>32412155 #>>32412376 #
LetsGetTechnicl ◴[] No.32412152[source]
Inflation isn't at 10% but it seems like investing in infrastructure is a good idea. If we needed to pinch pennies we could start at the bloated military budget
replies(1): >>32412343 #
_wolfie_ ◴[] No.32412343[source]
Right, in the middle of war with Russia and with war with China on the horizon. Great idea.
replies(3): >>32412716 #>>32413063 #>>32414026 #
themoonisachees ◴[] No.32412716{5}[source]
The US aren't at war with Russia.

Sure, they're helping an ally in a De facto war against Russia, but currently the us spends more on "defense" than both Russia and China combined, when it is technically at peace. In case of a war with China, are you expecting the military budget to not increase at all?

replies(1): >>32416784 #
Thetawaves ◴[] No.32416784{6}[source]
How do you stay at peace? A strong deterrence.
replies(1): >>32418569 #
1. pessimizer ◴[] No.32418569[source]
The US has the strongest deterrence in the history of the world, and it's constantly at war.