←back to thread

1135 points carride | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.25s | source
Show context
boplicity ◴[] No.32415153[source]
He's getting $2.6 million to set up access to 417 homes. That works out to $6,235 per home. At $55 per month, it would take 113 months, or over 9 years just to get $2.6 million in revenue.

Horrible economics! What a crazy business to be in. No wonder grants like this are necessary.

replies(6): >>32415254 #>>32415274 #>>32415325 #>>32415334 #>>32415347 #>>32415553 #
jrajav ◴[] No.32415334[source]
So taxpayer dollars are necessary to make this business viable, and the product of that business is something that, realistically, everyone absolutely needs access to - certainly seems like this should not be a private business at all but a public utility. Have we ever asked this kind of question for interstate highways?
replies(2): >>32415460 #>>32416320 #
1. floren ◴[] No.32416320[source]
The Grant County Public Utility District in eastern Washington (and presumably PUDs elsewhere in the nation) did exactly that. They built a fiber network throughout the county (physically large but pretty sparsely-populated), although they don't provide service directly to customers--instead, a healthy number of local ISPs still exist in the area. If fiber isn't at your house yet, there are also a few WISPs, which were easy to stand up because of the fiber.

https://www.grantpud.org/getfiber