←back to thread

The Dangers of Microsoft Pluton

(gabrielsieben.tech)
733 points gjsman-1000 | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
userbinator ◴[] No.32234457[source]
What is to prevent school WiFi from one day requiring a Pluton assertion that your Windows PC hasn’t been tampered with before you can join the network?

Remote attestation is the true enemy of your freedom. The power of the authoritarian corporatocracy to force you to use only the (entire) systems they control. It's worth reading https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/right-to-read.en.html again just to see how prescient Stallman was.

replies(12): >>32234704 #>>32235241 #>>32236203 #>>32236379 #>>32236408 #>>32237069 #>>32237245 #>>32238451 #>>32239672 #>>32239680 #>>32239999 #>>32240046 #
acdha ◴[] No.32237069[source]
> It's worth reading https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/right-to-read.en.html again just to see how prescient Stallman was.

I think it’s also worth asking why he didn’t have more impact despite pretty clearly seeing this problem. Part of the answer has to be resource disparities but I don’t think it’s just that - Linux didn’t really capitalize at all on Microsoft’s lost decade, and much of the innovation in security has happened on other platforms. I think there’s also some kind of blind spot in the open source community where a lot of people see this as something other people need, not them personally.

replies(3): >>32237422 #>>32238476 #>>32246107 #
underclocked[dead post] ◴[] No.32238476[source]
[dead]
the_af ◴[] No.32238594[source]
That's character assassination and it has nothing to do with Stallman's prescient warnings, which have proven more or less true. Also, Stallman != Linux.

Also also, his "rape" remarks have been mischaracterized but also came pretty late in the game, and had nothing to with with Linux's alleged lack of impact. Linux existed and was successfully deployed decades before any of these remarks.

I really expect better from comments on HN. This is tabloid level.

replies(3): >>32238882 #>>32239161 #>>32245492 #
underclocked ◴[] No.32239161[source]
The statement was why Stallman specifically has not had much of an impact, not Linux writ large. and, you're right. The rape comments came late. But let me remind you that it's emblematic of a larger... issue with Stallman's ability to communicate effectively. If you don't think the way Stallman behaves is at least partly to blame for people's ability to take him seriously, I don't know what to tell you.

https://daringfireball.net/2019/09/richard_stallmans_disgrac...

replies(1): >>32239603 #
1. the_af ◴[] No.32239603[source]
Not a fan at all of Gruber. But more importantly, Stallman's lack of hygiene is not terribly relevant to his points. We're not talking about being friends with Stallman, after all.

I also think when RMS made his more salient and prescient points, most people weren't familiar with him personally, just with his remarks. The world was less connected back then. So his personality flaws really didn't make a huge impact (nor should they have).