←back to thread

The Dangers of Microsoft Pluton

(gabrielsieben.tech)
733 points gjsman-1000 | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.2s | source
Show context
metadat ◴[] No.32234045[source]
Ew. Why are all the chip manufacturers going along with this stupid plan? I want to buy a processor and then own it and have it work in my best interests, not consume electricity and generatie heat enforcing draconian 3rd party DRM policies.
replies(12): >>32234130 #>>32234281 #>>32234326 #>>32234400 #>>32234486 #>>32234981 #>>32235753 #>>32235848 #>>32236170 #>>32236808 #>>32237073 #>>32240665 #
kimmeld ◴[] No.32234281[source]
The market (software/system builders) say that locked down platforms like the iPhone are fabulously profitable. Sorry.
replies(3): >>32234304 #>>32236130 #>>32236538 #
1. Vespasian ◴[] No.32236130[source]
And that's why the road to a better software ecosystem is not some hackers smart trick to defeat the system for the moment but very clear rules of what is allowed to be done in the name of security and what isn't

A legislative piece of paper (or many pieces of paper) have the power to reign in corporations far far beyond any technical solution or workaround.

And yes, that requires limiting (intellectual) property rights and regulating what certain contracts can enforce. Sometimes it's needed if you ask me

In my experience this sentiment is rejected primarily by many technical people because it feels like adding the human factor to a pristine world of logic. In reality it's humans all the way down and there is no reason to believe that Microsoft/Apple is a better steward than an elected body of representatives acting according to the rule of law