←back to thread

The Dangers of Microsoft Pluton

(gabrielsieben.tech)
733 points gjsman-1000 | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.215s | source
Show context
Gh0stRAT ◴[] No.32235028[source]
I'm completely missing how his example of a Word document that can only be opened by approved users on approved hardware within the corporation is supposed to be a bad thing.

Honestly, that sounds pretty fantastic. I've been using 3rd party tools/extensions to do this sort of thing in corporate and government environments for years, but having the attestation go all the way down to the hardware level is a big value-add, especially with so much ransomware/spyware/extortion/espionage going on these days.

Can someone please explain to me how the author might see this level of security as a bad thing?

replies(18): >>32235120 #>>32235149 #>>32235164 #>>32235474 #>>32235546 #>>32235795 #>>32235875 #>>32236359 #>>32236639 #>>32236668 #>>32236673 #>>32236797 #>>32236864 #>>32237450 #>>32237580 #>>32238544 #>>32238583 #>>32240740 #
ftyhbhyjnjk ◴[] No.32235120[source]
What you can install on YOUR pc will be at the sole mercy of microsoft/or maybe someone else.... That's the cusp of it. Not that it can be used for good, but that it sets the way for heavy misuse by large corporations.

Wait a few years. Smaller companies won't even be allowed to order high end cpu's. You'll be at 100% mercy of these corporations.

If after 2 years they decide to brick your pc, they'll just do it. You think government will help you out here? Lol...

replies(4): >>32235226 #>>32235674 #>>32236926 #>>32240490 #
eertvertvbw ◴[] No.32235226[source]
still waiting on the secure boot lockdown everyone has insisted is coming for the better part of two decades...
replies(9): >>32235552 #>>32235677 #>>32235684 #>>32235688 #>>32235827 #>>32236857 #>>32236915 #>>32237116 #>>32239001 #
1. yrro ◴[] No.32235684[source]
They're working on it. Microsoft's latest attempt is to disable the 3rd party UEFI CA by default.