←back to thread

The Dangers of Microsoft Pluton

(gabrielsieben.tech)
733 points gjsman-1000 | 9 comments | | HN request time: 2.147s | source | bottom
1. hgazx ◴[] No.32235350[source]
Regardless, I think that the pc platform deserves a good anti cheat solution.

Separating the groups of those who have a good anti cheat system enabled (such as this) and those who don’t is a good compromise for everybody. I think more reasonable companies such as Valve will go that way.

replies(2): >>32235387 #>>32235910 #
2. shmerl ◴[] No.32235387[source]
Good anti-cheat solution is server side AI. Anything client side is malware.
replies(2): >>32235494 #>>32235810 #
3. hgazx ◴[] No.32235494[source]
I know that this is a popular take here, which is why I proposed that there should be a mechanism to opt out. But that would mean that you would have to play against those who opted out as well.
replies(1): >>32235969 #
4. hammyhavoc ◴[] No.32235810[source]
Louder for the Cheeto-dust-covered people in the back.
5. Sakos ◴[] No.32235910[source]
Anything that prevents me from modding or cheating in my single player games is anathema to me. And companies like Activision, Ubisoft and Rockstar would love a hardware-based system that takes control away from gamers.
replies(2): >>32235959 #>>32236405 #
6. hgazx ◴[] No.32235959[source]
I didn’t say anything about single player games.
replies(1): >>32237741 #
7. tpxl ◴[] No.32235969{3}[source]
I would like to have an anti-cheat mechanism (that works), not a god damned security-nightmare rootkit that scans and uploads my private files to god knows where.
8. whywhywhywhy ◴[] No.32236405[source]
Who needs to cheat in a Ubisoft game? Just point to the marker, walk, then hit R1 a few times, rinse repeat for 30 hours.
9. Sakos ◴[] No.32237741{3}[source]
You didn't, but if the tech is there, it will be used.