←back to thread

231 points cachecrab | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.228s | source
1. seydor ◴[] No.31900514[source]
A lot of armchair scientists in the comments. It's quite striking effect but why is it published on IOS press? Looks like there might be more worth exploring in that dataset. What are the ways in which their result could be an artifact?