I think if fly succeeds, they need to figure out edge IaaS, and not put all their eggs into edge PaaS. And I hope they do! I'm curious what a successful edge IaaS looks like!
I think if fly succeeds, they need to figure out edge IaaS, and not put all their eggs into edge PaaS. And I hope they do! I'm curious what a successful edge IaaS looks like!
So it ended up hardly making sense to deploy anything less than like 80 racks per site, at which point it's basically a small region minus a few small pieces.
Then there's just the risk that the people who wanted whatever special GPU or SSD combination would quit wanting them and they'd just sit there unused indefinitely after that. Or stockouts when demand rose due to a conference or whatever that would tarnish the brand. And of course nobody wanted to pay more than like 10% markup. They were more amenable to long term contracts though. It was just hard to figure out the right use case and make it profitable.
Seemed like what customers really wanted out of them were nearby replacements for pieces of their own datacenter. It was exactly the opposite direction of where I was hoping things would go, which was something between fly and cloudflare workers. Not sure what they're doing now; I left about 18 months ago.
And, like I said earlier, I hope to see what a real edge IaaS solution looks like too, if such a thing is even possible. Maybe the IaaS that would allow a build-your-own-CDN.