←back to thread

528 points sealeck | 7 comments | | HN request time: 1.539s | source | bottom
1. 2c2c2c ◴[] No.31390855[source]
There's a lot of chat about fly.io on HN. possibly just because the founders and friends are posters here.

Is there any in depth comparison between them and render.com ?

replies(4): >>31390917 #>>31390927 #>>31390980 #>>31395090 #
2. atonse ◴[] No.31390917[source]
I think it is because they are refreshingly open about their stack and people love their writing tone.

And the architecture seems solid.

replies(1): >>31391268 #
3. mavbo ◴[] No.31390927[source]
Not in-depth, but two things that have stood out to me in assessing Render vs Fly are Render's lack of Multi-region apps and release phase scripts for running migrations. Easy multi-region apps seem to be a main selling point of Fly. However, both of the features I mentioned are on Render's roadmap (Multi-region apps has been on their roadmap since 2019, so maybe not a priority?)
replies(1): >>31391335 #
4. jchw ◴[] No.31390980[source]
As an occasional third-party Fly “shill” of sorts, I mainly talk about Fly because I’ve really wanted almost exactly what Fly does for a long time now. I’d tried other things like Hyper, Fargate and Cloud Run, but they’ve mostly been disappointing in some regards, being cumbersome to use or get started with, unrealistically expensive, or simply being too slow or limited. Fly is none of that. It still has some stuff that’s lacking; resizing disks is probably the biggest thing missing; the proxying is surprisingly complete but UDP services are a little awkward; copying data in and out is somewhat tricky, you have to use SSH but over a wireguard tunnel with an ephemeral SSH key and on Windows it’s not particularly fun. (I don’t think SCP is supported either, which is fine, but still.) It remains exciting nonetheless because it scratches an itch that I don’t feel anyone else has really managed to; Netlify and Vercel and probably Cloudflare Pages does static sites very well, but Fly feels like, so far, the first PaaS to do any arbitrary service very well. The ability to throw Docker images into micro VMs with such ease and speed with this paradigm is truly liberating.

edit: As a note, I have not tried Render. I am sure it is fine too. I found Fly first and it satisfies my needs well enough that I don’t feel it is necessary to keep searching, though I wouldn’t mind checking it out just to see what it has to offer.

5. sanjayio ◴[] No.31391268[source]
Agreed, really enjoyed their tone on explaining SQLite and litestream.
6. matthewcford ◴[] No.31391335[source]
these were the reasons we chose fly in the end; very happy with it
7. tailsdog ◴[] No.31395090[source]
They are backed by Y Combinator so that might be why they get extremely decent exposure on HN.