←back to thread

MDN Plus

(hacks.mozilla.org)
630 points sendilkumarn | 2 comments | | HN request time: 0.484s | source
Show context
jraph ◴[] No.30792928[source]
It seems fair enough. It won't prevent anyone from accessing the actual content and it probably makes it easy to justify paying something to MDN to employers.

In practice, if you are not paying:

- Bookmarks can most certainly easily replace the Collections feature

- you can clone the MDN repository for having the documents offline

- notifications could be computed from the commit log

and the subscription probably makes these features more convenient, at least for the notifications and the offline without actually removing rights from anybody.

Seems clever.

replies(3): >>30794167 #>>30797512 #>>30799516 #
ComodoHacker ◴[] No.30799516[source]
The only thing missing from this announce is the promise that all proceeds go to MDN and nowhere else, like subsidizing a failing product or paying C-suite bonuses.
replies(4): >>30799748 #>>30799793 #>>30800788 #>>30802962 #
cxr ◴[] No.30800788[source]
It's a wiki (at least it used to be). A lot of people, including me, spent a lot of time and effort building up the content on the site. Not for nothing—I got an intercontinental flight, a stay in a nice hotel, and a conference ticket in a new city—but many of the people who made the developer.mozilla.org content what it is are never going to see any of that money. The MDN staff, though, some of whom are almost certainly overcompensated despite project mismanagement and dubious choices on par with the judgment of Mozilla leadership itself, definitely will see some non-zero amount appear in their bank account every pay period.

For outsiders to show up with such strong opinions like yours, it feels... weird, at the very least.

replies(2): >>30802565 #>>30810551 #
1. ComodoHacker ◴[] No.30810551[source]
Are you arguing Mozilla shouldn't add paid subscription, or you're just expressing grief that you as a contributor won't see that money?

You can get into MDN team and get "overcompensated" too. There must be plenty of budget after recent layoffs, right?

replies(1): >>30815144 #
2. cxr ◴[] No.30815144[source]
Neither. I'm responding to your comment.