←back to thread

MDN Plus

(hacks.mozilla.org)
630 points sendilkumarn | 3 comments | | HN request time: 0.636s | source
Show context
dend ◴[] No.30793342[source]
This is an interesting take on documentation - mainly because I fail to see the value proposition in paying for the functionality provided.

Speaking from my own experience:

- Notifications. I am not sure that I've ever needed to know when a doc is updated, because if there is anything radical coming on the market (or in a spec proposal), there are other avenues to find out about it.

- Collections. That is already a functionality in the browser that is not locked into just one documentation site.

- Offline mode. There is Zeal[0] if you like client-side software and devdocs.io[1] if you like browser mode.

Combine all that with the fact that it's just for MDN, and the appeal kind of disappears. YMMV, of course.

[0]: https://zealdocs.org/

[1]: https://devdocs.io/

replies(5): >>30793450 #>>30794899 #>>30795480 #>>30795559 #>>30797845 #
1. giancarlostoro ◴[] No.30797845[source]
The value is that they've documented every front-end DOM api for you and done a lot of leg work for free for years. This will fund their efforts and they do more than just web, they've also been adding documentation on doing back-end web development as well. I'm sure the more subscribers they get, the more they can add. I sincerely hope MDN keeps the majority of the income from these efforts. For front-end work I skip Google or Stack Overflow and look through MDN.
replies(1): >>30799464 #
2. drstewart ◴[] No.30799464[source]
>The value is that they've documented every front-end DOM api for you and done a lot of leg work for free for years.

If that's the value, why don't they lead with that and leave the rest out?

replies(1): >>30830040 #
3. giancarlostoro ◴[] No.30830040[source]
Marketing people aren't necessarily developers. This is a case where you should let a sane developer do the marketing.