←back to thread

MDN Plus

(hacks.mozilla.org)
630 points sendilkumarn | 2 comments | | HN request time: 0.449s | source
Show context
chatmasta ◴[] No.30795352[source]
Fundamentally, maintaining MDN is costly because of the rate of instability in rapidly changing browser APIs. Those APIs change quickly and inconsistently because they’re managed by a centralized cabal of a few corporations with a combined multiple trillions of dollars in market cap. And yet, somehow it’s Mozilla, the browser vendor with the least money, that ends up saddling the cost for MDN. Why is this?

In general, Big Tech companies should pay more into open source, and especially into the standards committees they manipulate to their own ends. Perhaps there should be some kind of NATO-like membership fee based on percent of global revenue. It would be amusing to see w3c tax these corporations more efficiently than any government has been able to.

replies(11): >>30795393 #>>30795538 #>>30795578 #>>30795585 #>>30795679 #>>30795999 #>>30799159 #>>30799896 #>>30800980 #>>30803022 #>>30804578 #
spicybright ◴[] No.30795585[source]
I would love to see a solution like that. Or even if we could reliably tie a corporation to pay a fixed amount if they use free software would be nice.
replies(1): >>30795648 #
1. wahnfrieden ◴[] No.30795648[source]
You won’t find a satisfactory solution to this under the economic model they operate within
replies(1): >>30795796 #
2. theteapot ◴[] No.30795796[source]
Taxes are real. I even read about them in a modern economics text book.