←back to thread

MDN Plus

(hacks.mozilla.org)
630 points sendilkumarn | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.25s | source
Show context
jefftk ◴[] No.30792694[source]
Everyone who's been saying "I wish they would just charge money for this", here's your chance to put your money where your mouth is!
replies(11): >>30792806 #>>30792864 #>>30793192 #>>30793538 #>>30793573 #>>30793838 #>>30793922 #>>30793951 #>>30795050 #>>30795213 #>>30795499 #
reitanqild ◴[] No.30793192[source]
I didn't say that I think but I am tempted to pay anyway.

The big question is:

Does the money go to Firefox or to funny projects and (what I consider) insane exec salaries?

replies(7): >>30793292 #>>30793379 #>>30793402 #>>30794267 #>>30794592 #>>30794695 #>>30795077 #
geodel ◴[] No.30793292[source]
What is that insane salary? Seems you have no idea about how much executives are paid at that level in general. Or for Mozilla everyone has to work for free?
replies(6): >>30793323 #>>30793341 #>>30793418 #>>30793508 #>>30793528 #>>30793656 #
gruturo ◴[] No.30793508[source]
OP was clearly specific: EXEC salaries, not engineers and developers. And I'm not sure I would want their current execs there even if they indeed worked for free, not to mention at their absurdly high, grossly underserved salaries while they butcher the company all the way down.

So yeah, find me a way to finance Firefox only, and not the funny projects, and to ensure that not a single cent goes to their execs (neither directly nor through some creative accounting, where they reduce engineer salaries to offset the cashflow from this new stream, and pocket the savings), and you have my 10 bucks a month for the next 8 years (and possibly longer, but let's see what they do in 8 years). I won't move the goalposts and I'll make good on my promise.

replies(3): >>30793561 #>>30793692 #>>30794955 #
paxys ◴[] No.30793561[source]
The person you replied to was specific as well. Execs are paid well industry wide. If you aren't willing to pay market rates then you aren't going to get competent leadership to manage organizations at that scale.
replies(7): >>30793644 #>>30793661 #>>30793761 #>>30794208 #>>30794294 #>>30794571 #>>30795121 #
robertlagrant ◴[] No.30793761[source]
People like only certain things about Mozilla, most of which aren't due to execs. Firefox being well engineered (and not having meddling pointless features such as "Colorways") and up on the latest standards, good engineering representation in browser standards from a non-Google, and MDN. That'll do. Oh, and Rust, but the execs already did for that.

Don't need execs coming in selling VPNs with the browser.

And that's why people are worried about where the money will go.

replies(1): >>30793802 #
paxys ◴[] No.30793802[source]
So, good engineering things are not because of execs.

Bad engineering things are all because of execs?

replies(2): >>30793881 #>>30793977 #
getcrunk ◴[] No.30793977[source]
Generally, yes. That is the allegation. If you don't agree with that fine, but I'd imagine alot of engineers would agree with that in general with their experience in industry. Let alone Mozilla.
replies(1): >>30794230 #
1. geodel ◴[] No.30794230[source]
Yes, that would be revelation. Engineers saying engineers are right, doctors saying doctors are right.