←back to thread

MDN Plus

(hacks.mozilla.org)
630 points sendilkumarn | 1 comments | 24 Mar 22 16:46 UTC | HN request time: 0.205s | source
Show context
jefftk ◴[24 Mar 22 17:12 UTC] No.30792694[source]▶
Everyone who's been saying "I wish they would just charge money for this", here's your chance to put your money where your mouth is!
replies(11): >>30792806 #>>30792864 #>>30793192 #>>30793538 #>>30793573 #>>30793838 #>>30793922 #>>30793951 #>>30795050 #>>30795213 #>>30795499 #
reitanqild ◴[24 Mar 22 17:48 UTC] No.30793192[source]▶
I didn't say that I think but I am tempted to pay anyway.

The big question is:

Does the money go to Firefox or to funny projects and (what I consider) insane exec salaries?

replies(7): >>30793292 #>>30793379 #>>30793402 #>>30794267 #>>30794592 #>>30794695 #>>30795077 #
geodel ◴[24 Mar 22 17:54 UTC] No.30793292[source]▶
What is that insane salary? Seems you have no idea about how much executives are paid at that level in general. Or for Mozilla everyone has to work for free?
replies(6): >>30793323 #>>30793341 #>>30793418 #>>30793508 #>>30793528 #>>30793656 #
1. ralmidani ◴[24 Mar 22 18:05 UTC] No.30793418[source]▶
Nobody said anyone has to work for free. In general (not picking on Mozilla), I think it’s hypocritical when non-execs are told they should accept lower pay than they would make at a for-profit because “our mission!”, while execs justify their out-of-proportion pay by citing how much they could make at a for-profit. Shouldn’t executives be __more__ committed to the mission?