←back to thread

319 points SpaghettiX | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.212s | source
Show context
morelish ◴[] No.30284853[source]
Personally I’m happier to use wireguard to access my network. I don’t know when I’d ever want a pure SSH tunnelling solution.
replies(5): >>30285025 #>>30285367 #>>30289249 #>>30290444 #>>30293490 #
1. gen220 ◴[] No.30293490[source]
Wireguard, with dynamically-updated DNS resolution to a residential IP is very solid for a free tier and has the key benefit of zero third-party (i.e. not controlled by you) dependencies, other than the IP provider and the DNS resolver, which is a commodities business with low switching costs. Cloudflare is very nice and will be around for a long time, but it's still a third party dependency.

As it boils down, the OP's solution is "free" as in money but not as in freedom for a certain set of requirements.

Basically, going with CF trades-off some freedom for the considerable/legitimate protection benefits of being under the "cloudflare umbrella". It's probably a good trade for this moment in time. But rational people can disagree about whether it's a good trade when you broaden the time horizon to 5, 10, etc. years.

Like all things, it depends on the requirements you're building for.