←back to thread

319 points SpaghettiX | 3 comments | | HN request time: 0.445s | source
Show context
morelish ◴[] No.30284853[source]
Personally I’m happier to use wireguard to access my network. I don’t know when I’d ever want a pure SSH tunnelling solution.
replies(5): >>30285025 #>>30285367 #>>30289249 #>>30290444 #>>30293490 #
1. hoppyhoppy2 ◴[] No.30285025[source]
Cloudflare Tunnel uses Wireguard under the hood.
replies(2): >>30285298 #>>30288911 #
2. amiller2571 ◴[] No.30285298[source]
Never heard of Wireguard, so I went to their website and for a half second. I thought I cracked the screen on my new phone, because of their freaking background image....

But, it looks interesting. I'll have to check it out more.

3. anderspitman ◴[] No.30288911[source]
I believe they use WireGuard internally but the client connections are terminated over HTTP/2 frames, with QUIC support in the works.

https://blog.cloudflare.com/getting-cloudflare-tunnels-to-co...