←back to thread

622 points ColinWright | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.212s | source
Show context
kstrauser ◴[] No.30079330[source]
I sure hope that's right. It was the best feeling in the world to stand up an Apache server on my Amiga, and later my little FreeBSD server, and see my friends viewing the website I was hosting on my dialup connection. It wasn't pretty, it wasn't elegant, and it certainly wasn't fast, but it was mine. I made that. From installing the server to writing the HTML, I owned that service from end to end and had completely freedom to do whatever I wanted with it.

That's what I want the Internet to look like for my younger family and friends. It'll probably never happen exactly this way, but I can picture someone running an IPv6-only service on their phone to impress their friends. I know what their smile would look like because that was once my smile, too.

replies(14): >>30079383 #>>30079412 #>>30079441 #>>30079505 #>>30079550 #>>30079551 #>>30079596 #>>30079689 #>>30079823 #>>30080525 #>>30080756 #>>30080986 #>>30082530 #>>30085966 #
wolpoli ◴[] No.30079823[source]
The barrier of entry was actually lower than that. We didn't need to stand up an Apache server. We could just sign up for a Geocities/Xoom/Tripod account and upload HTML or use the built in site editor to create content.

Somewhere along the way, people stopped building well organized sites and started producing chronologically organized writings and content. These chronologically organized articles and content have dominated web content and social media ever since.

replies(7): >>30080325 #>>30080410 #>>30080427 #>>30080714 #>>30080960 #>>30082300 #>>30085341 #
BlueTemplar ◴[] No.30080325[source]
Yeah, I found it weird that the article called blogs "Web 1.0", I'm pretty sure that it was them that were first hailed as the new "Web 2.0" ?
replies(1): >>30082754 #
1. eitland ◴[] No.30082754[source]
Agree.

As far as I remember web 2.0 was all about user generated content spruced up with Ajax experiences:

Blogs (chronological as opposed to more freeform web sites) were arguably the first.

The comments, follows ("blog rolls"), tagging, ratings and third party sites providing the same like del.ico.us and digg.

RSS also was a web 2.0 thing in my mind at least.

I think most people classify Facebook as web 2.0 as well but in my mind they aren't as much web as a silo built on web technology.