←back to thread

622 points ColinWright | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.212s | source
Show context
kstrauser ◴[] No.30079330[source]
I sure hope that's right. It was the best feeling in the world to stand up an Apache server on my Amiga, and later my little FreeBSD server, and see my friends viewing the website I was hosting on my dialup connection. It wasn't pretty, it wasn't elegant, and it certainly wasn't fast, but it was mine. I made that. From installing the server to writing the HTML, I owned that service from end to end and had completely freedom to do whatever I wanted with it.

That's what I want the Internet to look like for my younger family and friends. It'll probably never happen exactly this way, but I can picture someone running an IPv6-only service on their phone to impress their friends. I know what their smile would look like because that was once my smile, too.

replies(14): >>30079383 #>>30079412 #>>30079441 #>>30079505 #>>30079550 #>>30079551 #>>30079596 #>>30079689 #>>30079823 #>>30080525 #>>30080756 #>>30080986 #>>30082530 #>>30085966 #
throwhauser ◴[] No.30079550[source]
How can a small website cope with GDPR compliance though? The rules that sprang up to constrain the social-media behemoths seem onerous for anyone but them to comply with.
replies(3): >>30079576 #>>30079601 #>>30080059 #
WesolyKubeczek ◴[] No.30079601[source]
By not collecting data it has no need for, and not passing that data on to third parties? By providing an ability to delete any user account, and for editing any personal information? By not using EBCDIC to store said information?

Are you making this more complicated than it needs to be?

replies(3): >>30079666 #>>30079754 #>>30138554 #
throwhauser ◴[] No.30079666[source]
> Are you making this more complicated than it needs to be?

I'm not sure. I guess if one trusts the default logging settings on the server software to be compliant, and only uses static HTML, maybe that's adequate? But as soon as any third-party code or data provided by some other server gets involved, it's hard to know what might be logged elsewhere as a result of visiting your site.

I mean, would an old-fashioned web visitor counter be compliant? It's tracking something in order to provide that number.

replies(2): >>30079839 #>>30080264 #
1. jrochkind1 ◴[] No.30079839[source]
You tell us you have no idea what third-party code you add might be tracking from users. And say this is a reason why you/they should be allowed to do it? (With "it" being... anything the third-party sites want to at all?)