←back to thread

565 points gaws | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.236s | source
Show context
biesnecker ◴[] No.30066616[source]
Seeing Night Watch at the Rijksmuseum a decade or so ago totally changed my view of seeing things in a museum vs. seeing them online. I'm a child of the internet and had this view that seeing it on my screen was good enough, but wow is Night Watch incredible up close and in person. Overwhelming, almost. A totally different experience.

That said, this image is amazing, and lets you see a lot more detail than you can easily manage at the museum.

replies(12): >>30067178 #>>30067649 #>>30067760 #>>30067783 #>>30068206 #>>30068646 #>>30069100 #>>30069177 #>>30069304 #>>30070314 #>>30072498 #>>30072922 #
vmception ◴[] No.30068206[source]
Same, in a similar note I’ve been a big fan of Alphonse Mucha and Art Nouveau all my life and I had no idea that he used gold paint!

Having seen so many jpegs and pictures in books of his works, it did not convey or describe this at all!

I passed one in a gallery one time (not looking for one) and the sheen from the lights reflecting totally changed everything in a more amazing way!

replies(2): >>30069366 #>>30069589 #
modeless ◴[] No.30069366[source]
An RGB value per pixel is not all of the information you need to render a painting accurately! To capture the effect you describe, paintings should be scanned with something that can capture a BDRF. Then viewing them in VR could give a very accurate experience.
replies(2): >>30069630 #>>30077054 #
1. ◴[] No.30077054[source]