←back to thread

238 points edent | 3 comments | | HN request time: 0.229s | source
Show context
imadethis ◴[] No.29809315[source]
This seems like a perfect use case for wild card certs, especially if you have internal sites on a different (sub) domain from your prod servers. Yes, multiple servers have the same private key, but when the alternative is self-signed or no encryption, that is an easy trade off for me.
replies(3): >>29809569 #>>29811047 #>>29812720 #
1. dijit ◴[] No.29812720[source]
Please stop advocating for wildcard certificates.

http://blog.dijit.sh/please-stop-advocating-wildcard-certifi...

http://blog.dijit.sh/follow-up-wildcard-tls-certificates

replies(2): >>29812885 #>>29813872 #
2. kayodelycaon ◴[] No.29812885[source]
Chrome is giving me certificate errors. NET::ERR_CERT_DATE_INVALID
3. imadethis ◴[] No.29813872[source]
…that’s why I said to have your LAN on a different domain or subdomain, so it can’t be a valid cert for your prod traffic.