/top/
/new/
/best/
/ask/
/show/
/job/
^
slacker news
login
about
←back to thread
Should you use Let's Encrypt for internal hostnames?
(shkspr.mobi)
238 points
edent
| 1 comments |
05 Jan 22 12:42 UTC
|
HN request time: 0.234s
|
source
Show context
meepmorp
◴[
05 Jan 22 14:11 UTC
]
No.
29809113
[source]
▶
>>29808233 (OP)
#
I've used
https://smallstep.com/docs/step-ca/
as a CA internally, works well.
replies(4):
>>29809289
#
>>29809335
#
>>29810148
#
>>29811399
#
mrweasel
◴[
05 Jan 22 14:25 UTC
]
No.
29809289
[source]
▶
>>29809113
#
What I'd want is an internal CA, like step-ca, but have the certificates signed by a "real" CA, so I don't have to distribute my own root CA certificate.
replies(7):
>>29809419
#
>>29809851
#
>>29809903
#
>>29810475
#
>>29810488
#
>>29811401
#
>>29812390
#
1.
meepmorp
◴[
05 Jan 22 15:52 UTC
]
No.
29810475
[source]
▶
>>29809289
#
Yeah, that is the major drawback.
ID:
GO
↑