←back to thread

693 points hienyimba | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.635s | source
Show context
avvt4avaw ◴[] No.28523479[source]
Buddy, your business is selling "privacy cards" and "virtual cards" which hide the identity of the person making the transaction.

It's a massive money laundering red flag, it's not at all surprising that Stripe doesn't want to deal with you.

replies(2): >>28523661 #>>28523831 #
cascom ◴[] No.28523831[source]
I “hide my identity” daily when I make transactions, it’s called cash, guess that’s a red flag.
replies(2): >>28523896 #>>28525728 #
ncallaway ◴[] No.28525728[source]
Aren’t cash businesses well known as money laundering opportunities?

Cash transactions above a specific dollar value literally generate reports to the government for investigation.

So, I think, yes, cash transactions tend to generate suspicion among anti-money laundering efforts.

replies(1): >>28540707 #
1. cascom ◴[] No.28540707[source]
So any business that accepts cash generates suspicion? I think not.

The reporting you are referring to only relates to bank transactions. In the US, When a business deposits their cash receipts, the bank generates a report. There is no obligation on the business (e.g.a car dealership that sells a car for $100k in cash has no incremental reporting burden)

More importantly - because x can be used in the commission of y crime, but the vast majority of the use of x is in perfectly normal/legal use, one should not cast suspicion on the use of x or reverse the burden of proof on for using x.