←back to thread

527 points lxm | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.202s | source
Show context
elric ◴[] No.27673501[source]
It's really simple: if I can't read your menu, I'm not eating. Goodbye. IIRC there's a law here that mandates a menu visible from outside the premises, it isn't always followed to the letter, but but most places comply, and it's a great way to avoid unpleasant pricing surprises.

Same with paying. You don't accept cash or credit cards? Goodbye. You only accept apple pay or some other nonsense payment system? Goodbye. And you'd better advertise your accepted payment methods outside if you want to avoid unpleasant surprises.

There are plenty of restaurants/bars out there. I'm not spending money in any place that clearly doesn't want me there.

And if you really insist on a silly QR menu, then at least include a human readable version of the URL. Seriously. It's not that hard.

replies(4): >>27673960 #>>27674018 #>>27674840 #>>27677705 #
dual_dingo ◴[] No.27673960[source]
> And if you really insist on a silly QR menu, then at least include a human readable version of the URL. Seriously. It's not that hard.

OK, here is the URL: > http://customer0931.incompetentagency.com/?location=2k12kx&i...

Have fun :)

replies(1): >>27674045 #
elric ◴[] No.27674045[source]
I would argue that doesn't quite qualify as human readable ... Surely something like https://restaurant.tld/menu would make more sense ...
replies(2): >>27674092 #>>27676273 #
1. dual_dingo ◴[] No.27676273[source]
Of course this is not useful or really human readable. It was meant as a "Be careful what you ask for" to the parent post and refers to the fact that at least in my part of the world, most restaurants are not part of a big chain and often end up with digital service/ad agencies of very dubious quality where this kind of URL would be completely acceptable both for the business owner and the agency because both just don't know any better.