←back to thread

527 points lxm | 5 comments | | HN request time: 0.709s | source
1. murphyslab ◴[] No.27672113[source]
As mentioned in the article, having a digital menu allows for a restaurant to adjust its offering in subtle and responsive ways. If a place is out of one ingredient, those items for which it is necessary could be struck.

Or one could have "surge pricing" — not desirable as a customer, but certainly for a dining establishment. And one could also collect more information on customers.

I'm still inclined toward tangible menus. For the one positive point (adaptability), I am reminded of one of the best restaurant meals that I ever had. The beer menu was a small laminated card, but the brief food menu was just written on a chalk board each day. When I arrived a few items were already struck with a line through them. One really can't beat that kind of simplicity, with no reliance on digital devices unless for payment, if desired.

(kelnos pointed out that I missed something in the article; edited to address that point.)

replies(2): >>27672134 #>>27672324 #
2. kelnos ◴[] No.27672134[source]
> If a place is out of one ingredient, those items for which it is necessary could be struck.

The article actually does mention that exact thing.

replies(1): >>27672538 #
3. MikeUt ◴[] No.27672324[source]
They could even charge different customers different rates, partnering with advertising firms to provide customer identification and segmentation.
replies(1): >>27672593 #
4. murphyslab ◴[] No.27672538[source]
Thanks. Not sure how I missed the line in the brackets; I'd only caught the part about seasonal entrees somehow.
5. murphyslab ◴[] No.27672593[source]
Or show a more affluent customer a different menu — one where everything is labelled deluxe, bespoke, or through terminology substitutions similar to "Patagonian toothfish" → "Chilean sea bass".