←back to thread

The top-ranking HTML editor on Google is an SEO scam

(casparwre.de)
1743 points caspii | 1 comments | 07 Jun 21 21:35 UTC | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
cybice ◴[08 Jun 21 06:48 UTC] No.27431350[source]▶
As webdeveloper I have a strong feeling that we are writing web for google bot and not for people. For any website I created I have a list from SEO what to add. Like 200 links at each page bottom, different titles, headers, metas, human readable urls without query params, all that canonical urls, nofollow rules etc. Most of this things invisible to users and created only for googlebot.
replies(12): >>27431423 #>>27431497 #>>27431591 #>>27431615 #>>27431679 #>>27431701 #>>27432029 #>>27432041 #>>27432191 #>>27433272 #>>27436384 #>>27437560 #
ricardo81 ◴[08 Jun 21 07:35 UTC] No.27431615[source]▶
Some of the technical SEO is good though, like simply making the page crawlable and content being in a logical order.

The "fiddle with H1" or "write X amount of words" or "buy Y number of links with a % of anchor text" is silly.

replies(2): >>27431648 #>>27431782 #
tomcooks ◴[08 Jun 21 07:41 UTC] No.27431648[source]▶
> Some of the technical SEO is good though, like simply making the page crawlable and content being in a logical order.

Semantic HTML has been created to help screen readers and browsers understand content organization, it having been hijacked by SE is just a side-effect.

replies(2): >>27431673 #>>27432822 #
1. dspillett ◴[08 Jun 21 10:20 UTC] No.27432822[source]▶
Though a useful side effect of SEO people finding it to be a useful side effect, is that what they are doing for their gain may help overall accessibility (where too often the opposite is the case, when people trying to game systems accidentally affect accessibility, it is usually negatively).