(casparwre.de)

1743 points caspii | 2 comments | 07 Jun 21 21:35 UTC | HN request time: 0.475s | source

Show context

FridayoLeary ◴[07 Jun 21 22:04 UTC] No.27427737[source]▶

Several points; the title is slightly misleading, i initially thought (in my ignorance) that OP was referring to a company employee, also this article is surprisingly open in 'naming and shaming' his competitor.

replies(1): >>27427867 #

caspii ◴[07 Jun 21 22:13 UTC] No.27427867[source]▶

>>27427737 #

Yikes, should I have shown more discretion in naming the competitor?

replies(4): >>27427944 #>>27428376 #>>27429562 #>>27429814 #

1. FridayoLeary ◴[07 Jun 21 22:18 UTC] No.27427944[source]▶

>>27427867 #

You know better then me. But i hope that since what you are saying is easily provable there shouldn't be any problem at all. Nice article, by the way.

replies(1): >>27427996 #

2. caspii ◴[07 Jun 21 22:23 UTC] No.27427996[source]▶

>>27427944 (TP) #

Thanks. I think it is.

↑

The top-ranking HTML editor on Google is an SEO scam