←back to thread

475 points danielstocks | 2 comments | | HN request time: 0.011s | source
Show context
timdaub[dead post] ◴[] No.27301664[source]
Sometime in the future, people will stop belittling crypto currencies when they realize that the digitization concepts of traditional finance technology providers are inferior to those of crypto currencies and blockchains. Putting safety and security first for anything that handles money makes sense.

The calls for "you don't need a blockchain, just use a database" will become less and less.

Edit: Of course, Hacker News hates this comment.

detaro ◴[] No.27301939[source]
Because crypto exchanges and smart contracts are such a shining beacon of bugfree code?
replies(1): >>27302082 #
def_true_false ◴[] No.27302082[source]
It's more about incentive alignment, and lack of free get out of jail cards -- people tend to assume you can just roll back fraudulent fiat transactions. Fuck up in crypto? Poof, the money is gone...

Compared to legacy finance, the exchanges are indeed bugfree. I would sooner trust Binance security team than people who think SMS is enough of a second factor. Never mind all the 'European unicorn' challenger 'banks'.

replies(1): >>27304772 #
1. 243423443 ◴[] No.27304772[source]
"you can just roll back fraudulent fiat transactions. Fuck up in crypto? Poof, the money is gone..."

Do you know why Ethereum Classic exists?

replies(1): >>27312509 #
2. def_true_false ◴[] No.27312509[source]
I'm well aware of ETC. It's not going to happen again on Ethereum, with any level of certainty, anyway. So crypto exchanges and similar won't be able to count on that.