Most active commenters
  • eumoria(3)
  • dang(3)

←back to thread

TikTok Remix Culture

(twitter.com)
327 points demail | 11 comments | | HN request time: 1.085s | source | bottom
1. eumoria ◴[] No.27164921[source]
The endless praise for TikTok here is very confusing. I don't think it's in bad faith the account age of the commenters all seem normal and the like.

I don't have any strong hatred of TikTok myself but usually HN are a privacy concerned skeptical bunch and this is very weird.

replies(4): >>27165031 #>>27165038 #>>27165600 #>>27167022 #
2. defaultname ◴[] No.27165031[source]
It's Vine 2.0 with great content creation tools and a surprisingly advanced set of filters. What's there to hate?

There is another comment somewhere down that claims that any positive opinion is "paid or smoking crack" and that is too common when people feel threatened by something.

Many of the things we do in life are simply a Waste Of Time (if we discount being entertained as a worthwhile pursuit). Commenting on HN is a waste of time. Reddit, Facebook, Chess, Gaming, Crosswords, Reading -- total waste of time. It's a bit strange when something comes along that people choose to entertain themselves with occasionally and invariably the "iT's AdDiCtInG!" arguments appear. Bizarre.

replies(2): >>27165479 #>>27165874 #
3. draw_down ◴[] No.27165038[source]
What are the privacy concerns exactly? It’s a firehose of video that shoves content down my gullet.

What is there to spy on — which videos I like or watch again? Doesn’t seem like particularly secretive data. Plus, who am I?

Besides which, something can be a good experience or nice to use even if it has other concerns. That does happen.

Nobody who is posting things like this is coming out and saying what they believe the actual problem to be. It’s all innuendo and implications, shady intimations about bots and privacy. Feel free to spit out what the actual problem is, guys!!

4. eumoria ◴[] No.27165479[source]
Thank you new account praising TikTok and saying HN is a waste of time and proving my point.

I didn't ask "what's there to hate" but rather almost NO posts on HN get critical praise for an invasive social media app.

Wow.

replies(2): >>27165701 #>>27168858 #
5. notsureaboutpg ◴[] No.27165600[source]
I don't have an account with Facebook, Instagram, Twitter, etc. I dislike lots of social media. Here's what I like about TikTok:

1) Quality content

2) Excellent content curation (better than YouTube recommended videos)

3) Not needing to have an account makes me happy

4) I can watch tiktoks shared with me from others without an account and without even visiting the site (videos can be downloaded or ripped using CLI programs).

6. selfhoster11 ◴[] No.27165874[source]
What's there to hate? The company behind it, said company's past conduct, and the links it's got to CCP.
replies(1): >>27166221 #
7. anon_tor_12345 ◴[] No.27167022[source]
yea bytedance has seen slowdown in user growth so they're growth hacking by targeting potential users on... hn.

how about it's a fun app and there are so many shitty apps that that makes it remarkable (worthy of remark)? i know that's why i posted what i posted.

8. dang ◴[] No.27168858{3}[source]
Please don't take HN threads further into flamewar. We're trying for the opposite here.

https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html

9. dang ◴[] No.27168859{4}[source]
Please don't take HN threads further into flamewar. We're trying for the opposite here.

https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html

10. dang ◴[] No.27168860{4}[source]
Please don't take HN threads further into flamewar. We're trying for the opposite here.

https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html

replies(1): >>27170767 #
11. eumoria ◴[] No.27170767{5}[source]
Absolutely, sorry about that.