←back to thread

437 points adventured | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.217s | source
Show context
SCAQTony ◴[] No.27161687[source]
The USA is also willing to defend Taiwan and currently the US has carrier groups in the south China sea. This suggests that the idea of building chips in the US may be a diplomatic courtesy and arguably an incentive.
replies(7): >>27161727 #>>27161793 #>>27161931 #>>27161972 #>>27161998 #>>27162036 #>>27162628 #
crocodiletears ◴[] No.27161998[source]
I would argue that by the time China comes to take Taiwan (when, not if), the US will be in a position where it is unwilling/able to expend the lives and funds required to provide a prolonged defense of a piece of land firmly in China's front yard.

Personally, I think we're at the point where the US would consider the costs of Taiwan's defense well beyond any potential benefits. It's too economically integrated with China, and the sheer number of bodies it would take aren't worth the moral victory.

Hong Kong is the writing on the wall. China wishes to restore integrity to what it regards as its territory.

TSMC must open facilities in the west because its Taiwan facilities are too dangerous to leave in enemy hands. It has to invest in capital outside of any potential conflict zone if it plans to exists over the long-term as a profit-making entity.

replies(8): >>27162099 #>>27162114 #>>27162121 #>>27162124 #>>27162210 #>>27162415 #>>27162470 #>>27164467 #
1. neither_color ◴[] No.27162470[source]
The Taiwan situation is not the same as Hong Kong's. In Hong Kong theyre merely speeding up the integration of a territory they already have full sovereignty over. The current government in China has never ruled over Taiwan. A lot can happen in 20-30 years and future regimes may be not be as eager to risk war over an island that's never been a part of their country during their lifetime.