←back to thread

437 points adventured | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
neonological ◴[] No.27161465[source]
You guys ever wonder why they don't choose California? These factories have huge environmental impacts that California is not okay with. These factories produce massive amounts of waste that cannot be recycled. This is also very likely to be the same exact reason as to why these talks didn't go so well in Europe.

Arizona like Texas is more business friendly at the expense of not looking out for the well being of people who live in these locations. Ironically, right now by being more business friendly more people want to move to places like Arizona or Texas for jobs.

It's a strange balancing act that has a lot of potential for being over corrected for. Industry brings business and economic growth but ruins the environment and has harms the people living in the area. The insidious thing is environmental costs are paid for much much later.

The consequences of being way to business friendly in these places may only be apparent a decade from now just like how the price of being too business unfriendly is now very apparent in California.

replies(5): >>27161511 #>>27161559 #>>27161644 #>>27161744 #>>27161969 #
oogabooga123 ◴[] No.27161644[source]
> Ironically, right now by being more business friendly more people want to move to places like Arizona or Texas for jobs.

This isn’t “ironically”, this is literally the primary argument in favor of this policy angle.

replies(2): >>27161689 #>>27162198 #
neonological ◴[] No.27161689[source]
The entire purpose of business regulation is to protect the people.

People choosing to give up this protection is the irony.

For example. Tobacco kills people. Government looks out for the interests of the people and regulates Big Tobacco. So Big Tobacco moves to a place where it is unregulated and free to distribute tobacco even to minors. People "IRONICALLY" against their own self interest follow the company because of jobs and money.

The above is just an example made really obvious. For semiconductors it's not so obvious. What exactly is the harm? It's not so evident, you need to do research to find out.

replies(2): >>27161962 #>>27161981 #
oogabooga123 ◴[] No.27161981[source]
I suppose you would have the government approve every individual action you take to ensure it isn’t against the interest of “the people”. I’m just glad there’s still enough voters who don’t think like you, to be honest. That concerns me a lot more than how dangerous the products in the store are.
replies(2): >>27162402 #>>27162444 #
1. adrianN ◴[] No.27162402{3}[source]
I don't think you need to argue against such a strawman. Do you think that literally all regulation is bad? Governments shouldn't exist at all?