←back to thread

437 points adventured | 3 comments | | HN request time: 0.828s | source
Show context
JohnJamesRambo ◴[] No.27161334[source]
I have no knowledge of the situation, why did they choose Arizona?
replies(7): >>27161341 #>>27161375 #>>27161385 #>>27161388 #>>27161398 #>>27161454 #>>27161661 #
mediaman ◴[] No.27161454[source]
Interestingly this came as a loss to Washington, where there is already a significant fab owned by TSMC called WaferTech. Their facility is on the WA side of the Portland suburbs.

Many felt WA was in the running because of the talent already there.

This caused concerns that the future of the WaferTech fab facility is dimmer than before, since it probably makes less sense to pump billions more into it in the future.

replies(4): >>27161611 #>>27161716 #>>27161808 #>>27162442 #
1. sircastor ◴[] No.27161716[source]
Apple picked up a lot of talent out west Of Portland where a lot of Intel’s home base is. But I imagine trying to find space out here would be rough.
replies(1): >>27161814 #
2. irrational ◴[] No.27161814[source]
There is actually quite a lot of room because of the Urban Growth Boundary.
replies(1): >>27161852 #
3. KirillPanov ◴[] No.27161852[source]
Aren't manufacturing plants required to be inside a UGB?

In Washington State they are, although existing plants are grandfathered.

I guess they could expand the UGB, which is what the Eastern Washington counties do in order to attract manufacturers.