←back to thread

192 points bgstry | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
vages ◴[] No.26887003[source]
I get the technical justification for doing this: You own your player, so you should be able to control it in whatever way you want. But as consumers, how do we expect the uploader to get paid for their work if we use both Adblock and Sponsor-skip (for the lack of a better word)?

Pay to watch is, of course, an option, but that leads to discrimination based on income – unequally distributed between parts of the world and individuals in the same part of the world. (Yes, I am aware that the sponsorship system leads the creators to cater to the more well-off within each bubble, so it's still a bit discriminatory.)

Any ideas or objections?

replies(13): >>26887078 #>>26887113 #>>26887116 #>>26887152 #>>26887154 #>>26887171 #>>26887177 #>>26887263 #>>26894852 #>>26895520 #>>26896735 #>>26899505 #>>26904839 #
1. t0mbstone ◴[] No.26896735[source]
I pay for Youtube Premium with the expectation that the content creators will get a cut of the monthly fee that I pay towards Youtube.

Is that not the case?

I'm really not a fan of the double-dipping that content creators are all doing now with their own unblockable inline ads.

I've actually stopped watching a number of Youtube channels because I get so annoyed by ads. I HATE HATE HATE ads!