←back to thread

192 points bgstry | 2 comments | | HN request time: 0.441s | source
Show context
vages ◴[] No.26887003[source]
I get the technical justification for doing this: You own your player, so you should be able to control it in whatever way you want. But as consumers, how do we expect the uploader to get paid for their work if we use both Adblock and Sponsor-skip (for the lack of a better word)?

Pay to watch is, of course, an option, but that leads to discrimination based on income – unequally distributed between parts of the world and individuals in the same part of the world. (Yes, I am aware that the sponsorship system leads the creators to cater to the more well-off within each bubble, so it's still a bit discriminatory.)

Any ideas or objections?

replies(13): >>26887078 #>>26887113 #>>26887116 #>>26887152 #>>26887154 #>>26887171 #>>26887177 #>>26887263 #>>26894852 #>>26895520 #>>26896735 #>>26899505 #>>26904839 #
ThatPlayer ◴[] No.26887116[source]
Personally I do pay for YouTube Premium, so videos I watch do make money (and do not have ads for me). As for in-video sponsor segments, I doubt the actual sponsors get any analytics about when they're skipped or not.
replies(4): >>26887135 #>>26887145 #>>26895249 #>>26896102 #
spockz ◴[] No.26895249[source]
Does YouTube share a part of your premium/fee to the creators based on what you watched? That is actually pretty neat.
replies(2): >>26896058 #>>26896424 #
1. ajayyy ◴[] No.26896424[source]
Creators are paid "a majority" of revenue from YouTube premium based on watch time.
replies(1): >>26900791 #
2. srg0 ◴[] No.26900791[source]
Do demonetized channels get their share? A couple of channels I watch swear a lot, and are demonetized. It's a bliss to watch YouTube without ad interruptions. I don't mind product placement by the content creators. I would be happy to pay if I knew they are paid too.