←back to thread

192 points bgstry | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.21s | source
Show context
rPlayer6554 ◴[] No.26886888[source]
I understand people don't like ads, but at some point doesn't someone have to pay creators for content? This feels just like stealing: I don't know how you can justify it: sponsor spots don't track you and they don't slow down your computer. Yes they are a minor inconvenience but they make the content you watch possible.
replies(14): >>26886974 #>>26886985 #>>26886988 #>>26887184 #>>26887197 #>>26887247 #>>26887269 #>>26887319 #>>26887341 #>>26890430 #>>26893033 #>>26895051 #>>26895827 #>>26896138 #
bassdropvroom ◴[] No.26886985[source]
For these sponsored contents it doesn't really matter though. The content creator has already been paid, so whether you watch the segment or not, they won't lose or make money.
replies(4): >>26887027 #>>26887038 #>>26887056 #>>26887126 #
1. q3k ◴[] No.26887056[source]
I could see it escalate into an arms race: if the new norm for watching videos will be to automatically skip sponsored segments by some popular software, the sponsorship offers will either dry up, or the resulting sponsorships will be designed to be more difficult to skip (eg. by making content creators incorporate them throughout the video in many small chunks, or as overlaid audio/video, ...).

Similar to what happened to web ads in communities that tend to run adblockers: more and more obnoxious advertising (intersitial ads, animated ads, etc.), advertising incorporated into content (ads-as-content like on Reddit), cross-site tracking and retargeting.

I tend to manually skip sponsored segments (especially for snake oil like VPN services!), but I'm not sure if writing automated software for this is the right thing to do in the long term.