←back to thread

544 points josh2600 | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.233s | source
Show context
raspyberr ◴[] No.26716994[source]
Super sad that they didn't choose Monero.
replies(5): >>26717040 #>>26717101 #>>26717512 #>>26718100 #>>26718787 #
AfouToPatisa ◴[] No.26717512[source]
Multiple reasons why MOB over monero but I will state only the most practical one, using the stellar consensus a tx takes 3-5sec. With monero that's more like 1-2mins if Im not mistaken which is a big no-no for the usecase of instant mobile private payments. Fees are also super low w/ mob (0.01)

TLDR: UX

replies(1): >>26718184 #
selsta ◴[] No.26718184[source]
XMR transaction can show up instantly once they are in the mempool, a user does not have to wait for a confirmation to see a transaction. Obviously there are uses where you want to wait for confirmations, but for the use case of sending money to friends it isn't necessary.

Fees are also in a similar range (0.01).

replies(1): >>26720776 #
1. AfouToPatisa ◴[] No.26720776[source]
Using 0-conf is restricting usage to "friends only" which is a tiny subset of who you may want to send money too so I think you've already answered this.

Also moxie replied in his twitter about why not monero stating they wanted a "non custodial" integration, not sure what he means but you can ask him.