←back to thread

425 points nixass | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.207s | source
Show context
beders ◴[] No.26676182[source]
Solar is now the cheapest form of energy. Ever.

Before you try to sink billions into nuclear energy, explain why we can't do it with solar + storage alone? Just one good reason. I've yet to hear anything substantive. All I keep hearing is soundbites from the nuclear and fossil fuel industry.

All is missing is the political will, not technology.

Use nuclear for situations in which there are no alternatives. Rovers on Mars or something.

replies(8): >>26676287 #>>26676405 #>>26676422 #>>26676440 #>>26676785 #>>26679063 #>>26680974 #>>26684544 #
titzer ◴[] No.26676422[source]
Sure. Just tell me where you are going to put all those solar panels now. On house roofs? In cities? Sounds great. In the desert? Count me out. We are going to cover this planet in tech junk like it's Blade Runner 2049. That's not a future I want to see. I like the deserts the way they are.
replies(1): >>26677399 #
ldbooth ◴[] No.26677399[source]
All of the above, because it works at residential and commercial scale at the load with no line losses, and at utility scale utilizing the existing spoke and wheel grid model, and for cities we'll use the community solar model already popular today. Welcome to the present!
replies(1): >>26677430 #
titzer ◴[] No.26677430[source]
Like I said before, I think local solar is great. But utility scale solar is an environmental nightmare. Look at Ivanpah. Do you want the deserts covered in that?
replies(2): >>26677442 #>>26677450 #
1. ldbooth ◴[] No.26677450[source]
Ivanpah and concentrating solar power is not cost effective. CSP is dead. There are true environmental concerns but solar is the least worst option.